Ummagumma- Studio Disc or Live Disc
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Lying On An Eiderdown
Ummagumma- Studio Disc or Live Disc
Which disc of Ummagumma do you guys prefer? Personally, it would have to be the live disc. I can just let it repeat forever on my turntable (especially side 2). The disc has so much live power (not saying that I dislike the studio disc, I just like the other better)
-
- Axe
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:03 pm
- Location: Quebec (Canada)
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
I've stated before that I fail to see the point in comparing one disc of a double set against another.
I hold the view that a double album is meant to be taken as a whole...if I were going to listen to any of Ummagumma, I would be more likely to put in disc one, let it play and then put in disc two and let it play.
However, I didn't see this as an option...so, just to keep from looking like a total ass by refusing to take part but post anyway; I'll say disc one.
Because, for the most part, once the song gets underway and the audience shuts up (and they DO shut up for the most part,) then it sounds like a studio album that actually captures the energy of a live performance.
I'd even dare to say that it might just be THE perfect live album...all killer, no filler.
I hold the view that a double album is meant to be taken as a whole...if I were going to listen to any of Ummagumma, I would be more likely to put in disc one, let it play and then put in disc two and let it play.
However, I didn't see this as an option...so, just to keep from looking like a total ass by refusing to take part but post anyway; I'll say disc one.
Because, for the most part, once the song gets underway and the audience shuts up (and they DO shut up for the most part,) then it sounds like a studio album that actually captures the energy of a live performance.
I'd even dare to say that it might just be THE perfect live album...all killer, no filler.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Lying On An Eiderdown
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
This may sound a little odd, but I have a certain "concept" that I've worked up that I like to keep in mind while listening to Ummagumma. It's kind of cheesy, but it's just the idea that disc one is a concert that the band plays...after the concert, they go back to their rehearsal space or studio or whatever and just kind of play as a warm up for whatever PF album ends up getting played next.
Because there WILL be another one played after it, lol.
Because there WILL be another one played after it, lol.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Lying On An Eiderdown
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 2:36 am
- Location: in a midwestern-type autoplant town, waiting for the autopocalypse to come
Ummagummas a different sort of double album than The Wall
it really is two distinct ideas for an album packaged as a single product
I see no more reason to listen to both halves in one sitting than with A Nice Pair
I think, after abandoning The Man and The Journey, that they were a little lost about what to do for their next release, and had two halfbaked ideas, neither entirely satisfactory, so put them both out together
the studio record in fact could be looked at as four seperate mini-albums in itself, as the four Floyds didnt worry about what the others were doing when they assembled their bits - to listen to all four parts in sequence a listener would be imposing a narrative upon the four pieces that the individual musicians did not intend
anyway I like the live record, it flows nicely, the songs improve upon the studio versions, and until I found a boot of the Pompeii soundtrack, it was the only Live Floyd album in my collection
it really is two distinct ideas for an album packaged as a single product
I see no more reason to listen to both halves in one sitting than with A Nice Pair
I think, after abandoning The Man and The Journey, that they were a little lost about what to do for their next release, and had two halfbaked ideas, neither entirely satisfactory, so put them both out together
the studio record in fact could be looked at as four seperate mini-albums in itself, as the four Floyds didnt worry about what the others were doing when they assembled their bits - to listen to all four parts in sequence a listener would be imposing a narrative upon the four pieces that the individual musicians did not intend
anyway I like the live record, it flows nicely, the songs improve upon the studio versions, and until I found a boot of the Pompeii soundtrack, it was the only Live Floyd album in my collection
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
Be that as it may, they could have released each album seperately...but they didn't. Even if the reasoning is only because niether half would stand on it's own, that indicates a certain cohesiveness (however ill-executed,) to the album as a whole.Ummagummas a different sort of double album than The Wall
it really is two distinct ideas for an album packaged as a single product
I see no more reason to listen to both halves in one sitting than with A Nice Pair
It's not two seperate albums released together (as "Use Your Illusions" for an example,) but a double album released as a package.
Right...they put them out together as parts of the same package. Again, however tenuous it might be, they obviously felt that it made sense for the two albums to be parts of the same whole.I think, after abandoning The Man and The Journey, that they were a little lost about what to do for their next release, and had two halfbaked ideas, neither entirely satisfactory, so put them both out together
Really? Because I don't see it that way.the studio record in fact could be looked at as four seperate mini-albums in itself, as the four Floyds didnt worry about what the others were doing when they assembled their bits - to listen to all four parts in sequence a listener would be imposing a narrative upon the four pieces that the individual musicians did not intend
One COULD listen to the parts without imposing a narrative on them...in much the same way that one can listen to The White Album without imposing a narrative on it.
Not all albums have narratives, you know...in fact, most of them don't.
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:55 pm
- Gender: Male
-
- Axe
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:50 am
- Location: Portland, OR
-
- Blade
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:23 am
- Location: London
But their intention in 1969 was to release those live songs so that they could then *stop* playing them and move on to new material. It backfired of course, making those songs more popular with the fans, so that AD wasn't dropped from the set for a further 18 months or so, ASOS another year after that, and the other two tracks were still a regular part of the set until four years after Ummagumma's release - by which time that new material had long since come and goneDark Lord Guy wrote:They should have wited til '71 or so to release a live album. A double even - consisting of the four Ummagumma tracks, "Embryo", "One of These Days", and "Echoes". Basically the 'Pompeii soundtrack + 2'...
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 15156
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:41 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Dylan Moran as Bernie, in whom Ray Davies meets Pete Doherty. Otherwise, Tallinn, Estonia.