Moom's Banning 2012

[Keith Jordan]

The user Moom has had his account banned for 6 months due to non-conformance with the forum rules on a consistent basis despite a series of past consultations, previous shorter bans and an almost constant flow of PMs about his forum flooding, pointless replies to every topic on the forum and, more recently, his perverted over-taking of a RIP thread. His account shall be re-instated on 29th November 2012 when, I hope, he will return a reformed individual more adept at conducting himself in a proper manner.


Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.

[Meandthem]

Hmmm...

"So don’t worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring its own worries. Today’s trouble is enough for today."?

Well, Moom was the first to bid me welcome to this forum.
I treasure that!

[ddebil]

Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.

"Let he who wears socks with sandals be banished for an eternity - well, 6 months at least."

[boo]

(much nicer than what i would have said)

[rememberaday]

Sad. Can't wait till November 29th.

[Stephen]

Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.

Is he a member too ?

[thefinalcut]

The user Moom has had his account banned for 6 months due to non-conformance with the forum rules on a consistent basis despite a series of past consultations, previous shorter bans and an almost constant flow of PMs about his forum flooding, pointless replies to every topic on the forum and, more recently, his perverted over-taking of a RIP thread.

Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.

[Keith Jordan]

Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.

He had years of warnings but he decided to ignore them.

[thefinalcut]

Well, in that case I back you up on your resolution.

[my breakfast.]

Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.

He had years of warnings but he decided to ignore them.

I don't think he ignored them though. I think he just couldn't realistically act on the advice and warning you were giving him. As I said before, I think his somewhat antisocial behaviour ran a little bit deeper than just 'another perv on the internet'. However given my squabbles with him I am probably sat a little too close to the pit face to offer any opinion without sounding like I'm trying to clear my own name or somesuch.

[rememberaday]

(Ignore this post if you want to, and ignore it again if you've not read my breakfast's post. If you've read it, ignore it still. )

[boo]

i don't miss him, i'm not sorry he's gone. and although i think alan may be right about him not fully understanding his own antisocial behavior, i don't think that excuses it either. i don't know, or care, if he ever understood the disgusting remark he made to me, but he definitely never really apoligized for it. his self-serving little "oh woe is me" thread after his last ban proved that.

...and if he ever comes back, i hope he never addresses me again, even with a long-overdue apology. i certainly will not acknowledge him. stupid little (insert your own expletive).




(oh...did i say that out loud??)

[Damn!t]

I have him on ignore for a very long time now...
Dont see a reason to trouble my grey cells with his posts.

[thefinalcut]

Dont see a reason to trouble my grey cells with his posts.

LOL !

[J Ed]

how come the ontopic parts of NPF have been virtually silent these last two weeks but the one thread talking about moom keeps getting several additional comments every day?
surely somebody else has bought a new album they could be telling us about, instead of gossiping about moom yet again, just for example
and theres other non-moom-related threads all over the forum that could benefit from your contributions