me too, me too. but because he is still a british citizen it might prove kinda problematicrorygentry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:40 pm Roger is still not a US citizen... I'd like to hear him talk as much crap about his Queen as he does our Presidents.
ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
-
- Axe
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:45 am
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:30 pm
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
Well sort of in luck? He's having another go! The Israeli Defence Force's training was indirectly responsible for George Floyd's death.thefinalmutt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:38 amme too, me too. but because he is still a british citizen it might prove kinda problematicrorygentry wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 9:40 pm Roger is still not a US citizen... I'd like to hear him talk as much crap about his Queen as he does our Presidents.
It's like he's got something released to promote?
https://www.nme.com/news/music/roger-wa ... ew-2695522
Gives you the highlights they didn't print. Full madness with below link
https://www.memri.org/tv/pink-floyd-mus ... der-blacks
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:54 am
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
That one looks jewish
And that one's a coon
And that one's a coon
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:26 pm
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
Can you please tell me which point you intend to make by quoting these lyrics?
-
- Lord!!
- Posts: 3767
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:03 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: making a run to the heart of the sun
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
Roger reminds me of your crazy uncle,you know you love him but you wish sometimes he would just shut the hell up.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:54 am
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
Sure, but first tell me which point Waters was making when he wrote it.Annoying Twit wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:20 amCan you please tell me which point you intend to make by quoting these lyrics?
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:26 pm
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
He was depicting a character who, among other things, was falling into racism and fascism.Kerry King wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:22 pmSure, but first tell me which point Waters was making when he wrote it.Annoying Twit wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:20 am
Can you please tell me which point you intend to make by quoting these lyrics?
So, what point did you intend to make when you quoted those lines?
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:54 am
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
It illustrates Waters' willingness to use archaic racial slurs while hiding behind one of his flimsy characters. Who was still using the word coon in 1979? Only Waters, hiding behind Pink. Thanks for your interest. Sorry if my reply cannot be twisted around to be used against me, if that was your intention. It seems like it might have been your intention.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:26 pm
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
I think this analysis of the use of that language in The Wall is simply wrong. Waters is not his character, nor is he 'hiding behind' the character. Waters is critiquing those attitudes, and that language.Kerry King wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:24 pm It illustrates Waters' willingness to use archaic racial slurs while hiding behind one of his flimsy characters. Who was still using the word coon in 1979? Only Waters, hiding behind Pink. Thanks for your interest. Sorry if my reply cannot be twisted around to be used against me, if that was your intention. It seems like it might have been your intention.
You are failing to tell the difference between satire and reality.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: Somewhere else altogether
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 2:18 pm
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
With Roger saying what he did about Polly that probably was the nail in the coffin of him ever getting his stuff promoted on PF site while he is alive. We all agree that Polly's books really don't belong there. But Rogers vids and his other vids like this are not helping his supposed cause and pledge to be promoted on those social media pages.
-
- Axe
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:45 am
Re: ROGER WATERS IN EMBARRASSING U.S. POLITICAL OPINION SHOCK!!!
I agree, it was quite a dumb, counter-productive move. But many 'fans' seem not to get the difference between being wrong and saying the right thing incorrectly, and go apeshit when they hear rog expressing his opinion in a blunt, uncensored manner cause apparently it renders his whole speech Invalid. Well guess what folks, he's always been like this. It's just his style of expression, so if you can't see the message beyond the formulation, why keep watching his videos ? It's almost like some of you enjoy being angry at him...azza200 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 28, 2020 11:29 pm With Roger saying what he did about Polly that probably was the nail in the coffin of him ever getting his stuff promoted on PF site while he is alive. We all agree that Polly's books really don't belong there. But Rogers vids and his other vids like this are not helping his supposed cause and pledge to be promoted on those social media pages.