Doyle Bramhall II

Talk about other Floyd related musicians here.
User avatar
decampos
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: London
Been thanked: 7 times

Doyle Bramhall II

Post by decampos »

I finally got round to buying Roger's 'In the flesh' DVD.

Does anyone here agree with me that Doyle Bramhall II needs a good smack?
User avatar
UntilWeSleep
Axe
Axe
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 7:47 am
Location: HUH

Re: Doyle Bramhall II

Post by UntilWeSleep »

decampos wrote: Does anyone here agree with me that Doyle Bramhall II needs a good smack?
Why does he need a good smack??? Is it because he destroyed perfect David Gilmour guitar solos? or is it because he plays blues guitar and you hate blues??
User avatar
decampos
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:24 pm
Location: London
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Doyle Bramhall II

Post by decampos »

UntilWeSleep wrote:
decampos wrote: Does anyone here agree with me that Doyle Bramhall II needs a good smack?
Why does he need a good smack??? Is it because he destroyed perfect David Gilmour guitar solos? or is it because he plays blues guitar and you hate blues??
I don't hate blues. I don't think I've ever said that.
User avatar
Real Pink in the Inside
Judge!
Judge!
Posts: 2012
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:31 pm
Location: The Dark Side of Neptune
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Doyle Bramhall II

Post by Real Pink in the Inside »

UntilWeSleep wrote: Is it because he destroyed perfect David Gilmour guitar solos?
I'm surprised you haven't noticed that even Gilmour can't perfectly emulate his own studio solos when he is performing live.
User avatar
Stilgar
Knife
Knife
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:43 am
Location: Germany

Re: Doyle Bramhall II

Post by Stilgar »

Real Pink in the Inside wrote:
UntilWeSleep wrote: Is it because he destroyed perfect David Gilmour guitar solos?
I'm surprised you haven't noticed that even Gilmour can't perfectly emulate his own studio solos when he is performing live.
Yep, but he still doing perfect solos, a bit different, but perfect... :wink:
User avatar
Tommy
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 913
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 10:55 pm
Location: Austin

Post by Tommy »

bands shouldnt do the same thing they do in the studio, i mean, no one wants to go to a concert and hear the CD thats in their car that very moment
User avatar
UntilWeSleep
Axe
Axe
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 7:47 am
Location: HUH

Re: Doyle Bramhall II

Post by UntilWeSleep »

Real Pink in the Inside wrote:
UntilWeSleep wrote: Is it because he destroyed perfect David Gilmour guitar solos?
I'm surprised you haven't noticed that even Gilmour can't perfectly emulate his own studio solos when he is performing live.
Of course there is going to be a differnce between live and studio. In the studio, he is able to overdub & add effects. He also extends his guitar solos live so you can have an experience on improvisation on the guitar. As Tommy said I don't think you would want to hear the same exact thing live.
User avatar
Keith Jordan
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 17324
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Post by Keith Jordan »

I dont think any 2 renditions of a guitar solo are exactly the same. Improvisation is key. When Gilmour records in the studio, he said that he records several takes of the solo and chooses the best bits and puts them all together to get the best result. It would be rather boring to reproduce a studio recording live. I, myself, need some variation. :)
User avatar
grateful pink
Knife
Knife
Posts: 379
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 3:11 pm
Location: Eureka CA USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by grateful pink »

Improv Is the key. Who wants to hear the same solo at every show. I don't call myself GRATEFUL pink for nothin'. The grateful dead are essentially a live improvisational band and that is why there are so many dead shows out there that people want. Each is very different.
Spinoza
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:35 pm

Post by Spinoza »

Indeed, Pink Floyd was in the first place an improvisationband. Not only on stage, but also in the studio. Someone came up with an idea ( mostly roger ) and on this the band would add their own input. Hence the nice balance between lyrics and music ( not only the chords). With Pink floyd, you mostly get at least 50 perc of music, if not more. That's why i like Pink Floyd. 22 min versions of Saucerful of Secrets, 15 min versions of Fat Old Sun. Love it. Keypeople in this were Dave and Rick, which really defined the "classic Floydsound" ( IMO ).
User avatar
Keith Jordan
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 17324
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Post by Keith Jordan »

Spinoza wrote:Someone came up with an idea ( mostly roger ) and on this the band would add their own input.
How do you know?? :lol:
Spinoza
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:35 pm

Post by Spinoza »

Well very simple Keith: just listen to all those bootlegs with 12 min version of Green is the colour, Fat old Sun and many others. Those solo's were not written in the studio at that time. Most of these songs are solely credited to Roger ( Cymbaline, Set The Controls, Green is the colour, Embryo, even later Raving and Drooling was heavily worked on musically during touring. Later in the seventies, a lot of Solo's were added by Gilmour ( eg Have a Cigar, Time ).
NewEarthMud

Post by NewEarthMud »

Doyle II actually done a hell of a job. If you knew anything about guitar you'd know that he is extremely talented. B.B. King asked Doyle to be the ONLY guitar player on B.B.'s new record which will be released soon. It's a record B.B. has wanted to do for a very long time... like 50 something years... a ballad record. Doyle is the only other player on there besides King.

Doyle II's Dad said it best -"From the beginning, Doyle just had the indefinable something that separates the good from the very good. I don't know what you call it, but Stevie had it, so does Doyle!"

I agree
User avatar
quicksilver
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 905
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 7:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin USA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by quicksilver »

Spinoza wrote:Well very simple Keith: just listen to all those bootlegs with 12 min version of Green is the colour, Fat old Sun and many others. Those solo's were not written in the studio at that time. Most of these songs are solely credited to Roger ( Cymbaline, Set The Controls, Green is the colour, Embryo, even later Raving and Drooling was heavily worked on musically during touring. Later in the seventies, a lot of Solo's were added by Gilmour ( eg Have a Cigar, Time ).
Which is why I believe that Dave Gilmour was the best thing to ever happen to Roger Waters. He was able to take an idea and expand upon it. I love Rogers lyrics and all but Dave and Rick made them come alive.
NewEarthMud

Post by NewEarthMud »

Rick Wright...? How does he come into play? He did some "good" stuff early on but when I hear people act as if he had more to do with Floyd than Roger I just want to laugh! Rick early on did good things but slowly drifted away into drugs or whatever..

Just take a look at his solo records and then try and say he's a genius or that he was the "big part" of Pink Floyd.