Rhamadam - How good is it ?

All discussion related to Roger Keith (Syd) Barrett.
User avatar
danielcaux
Supreme Judge!
Supreme Judge!
Posts: 2546
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Abya Yala

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by danielcaux »

Don't you find it a little strange how Rhamadam doesn't sound like ANYTHING Syd ever done, before or after, musically and production wise? It may be because of the new mix, but this sounds a lot more like mid 70s Zappa to my ears than late 60s Barrett. It's a lot more looser and erratic a jam, but the actual sound is more similar to something like The Ocean Is The Ultimate Solution than to Nick's Boogie or Interstellar Overdrive or even Lanky IMO. I wonder how much input Syd really had in this recording.
Wolfpack
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by Wolfpack »

danielcaux wrote:I wonder how much input Syd really had in this recording.
He lets the other musicians do most of the work. He lets the other musicians wait for him to please take the lead and give a direction.
His input is the guitar work that never really comes to surface.
User avatar
pinksmile
Axe
Axe
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Sydney'Australia.

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by pinksmile »

I have finally heard Rhamadam and it sounds very similar (to me anyway) to the type of stuff Miles Davis was doing around the same time. Take a listen to the Miles Davis album Bitches Brew and you will no doubt see the similarities. Bitches Brew came out around 1969/70 and Rhamadam may well have been influenced by this album. If you like Rhamadam then get yourself a copy of Bitches Brew, you'll love it.
User avatar
danielcaux
Supreme Judge!
Supreme Judge!
Posts: 2546
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Abya Yala

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by danielcaux »

Keith Jordan wrote:Personally I do not see any appeal in Rhamadan. It is just noise to me. However, the rest of the album is excellent.
Being familiar with the Barrett catalog for quite some time, Rhamadan is definitively the highlight from this release for me (followed by Matilda's new mix and the inclusion of the Here I Go complete ending solo). Too bad they didn't include the track on the actual disc, or at least release it in a lossless format online, because well I understand that it is kinda difficult to cram a 20 minute obscure improv into a 80 minute best of CD, but releasing one lossless track on the net is not rocket science at all. Anyway, it really surpassed my expectations, I thought it was going to be just congas and bongos and noises for 20 minutes, but it has some interesting sounds going on, mainly those piercing keyboard blurps and the weird stacatto mellotron around the middle, and also some nice grooves created by the bass and percussion interplay. It reminds me a lot of the more abstract parts of AHM and Echoes. Probably this is the closer we will ever get to actually hear what was the sound that he had in mind for the Floyd to go after Saucerful; it does sound like a natural evolution from the things they where trying on the title track of that album and the "bridge" of Jugband Blues. Perhaps a couple of female saxophonist would have complete the picture?

I'm glad they finally released, a very interesting historic document.
User avatar
zag
Judge!
Judge!
Posts: 2330
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:50 pm
Location: in the woods

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by zag »

danielcaux wrote: Being familiar with the Barrett catalog for quite some time, Rhamadan is definitively the highlight from this release for me (followed by Matilda's new mix and the inclusion of the Here I Go complete ending solo).
my thoughts exactly. I do wonder why "If It´s In You" have to be there, uncutted as it is. What´s the point in it ? Dave´s bad conscience ? :?
User avatar
danielcaux
Supreme Judge!
Supreme Judge!
Posts: 2546
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Abya Yala

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by danielcaux »

zag wrote:
danielcaux wrote: Being familiar with the Barrett catalog for quite some time, Rhamadan is definitively the highlight from this release for me (followed by Matilda's new mix and the inclusion of the Here I Go complete ending solo).
my thoughts exactly. I do wonder why "If It´s In You" have to be there, uncutted as it is. What´s the point in it ? Dave´s bad conscience ? :?
I was thinking about that yesterday, and my hypothesis is that perhaps Gilmour is actually fond of the track, as it is, because it was one of the tracks he originally produced for Madcap, along with She Took a Long Cold Look, also present on this comp. I personally think those two tracks were rushed jobs made in the last day of recording; the actual songs had potential, but they weren't able, or didn't want, to work much on them.

The problem with that hypothesis is that Gilmour also produced Golden Hair and Long Gone (and even Feel too), which in my opinion are superior recordings production-wise. So who knows... perhaps it was Roger who produced those tracks? :lol:

The one thing I like is that they fixed the volume level of She Took A Long Cold Look, on Madcap it was really overblown compared with the rest of the album tracks. The page turning didn't bother me at all, but this new edit is nice too, more "profesional".
sashwap
Embryo
Embryo
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:55 pm

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by sashwap »

danielcaux wrote:
zag wrote: my thoughts exactly. I do wonder why "If It´s In You" have to be there, uncutted as it is. What´s the point in it ? Dave´s bad conscience ? :?
I was thinking about that yesterday, and my hypothesis is that perhaps Gilmour is actually fond of the track, as it is, because it was one of the tracks he originally produced for Madcap, along with She Took a Long Cold Look, also present on this comp. I personally think those two tracks were rushed jobs made in the last day of recording; the actual songs had potential, but they weren't able, or didn't want, to work much on them.

The problem with that hypothesis is that Gilmour also produced Golden Hair and Long Gone (and even Feel too), which in my opinion are superior recordings production-wise. So who knows... perhaps it was Roger who produced those tracks? :lol:

The one thing I like is that they fixed the volume level of She Took A Long Cold Look, on Madcap it was really overblown compared with the rest of the album tracks. The page turning didn't bother me at all, but this new edit is nice too, more "profesional".
for what it's worth, i'm glad they included this bare, stripped-down track. acoustic songs like "dark globe" and "if it's in you" are as much a part of syd's solo output as more produced tracks. "if it's in you" is quintessentially syd, pure and unfiltered. it's one of his catchiest songs and contains a lot of great lyrical imagery. it's one of my favorites!
User avatar
dgsyd1
Knife
Knife
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 1:52 am
Location: Michigan, US

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by dgsyd1 »

pinksmile wrote:I have finally heard Rhamadam and it sounds very similar (to me anyway) to the type of stuff Miles Davis was doing around the same time. Take a listen to the Miles Davis album Bitches Brew and you will no doubt see the similarities. Bitches Brew came out around 1969/70 and Rhamadam may well have been influenced by this album. If you like Rhamadam then get yourself a copy of Bitches Brew, you'll love it.
It reminds me more of certain parts of In A Silent Way for some reason. it wasn't an influence on Syd though, as "Rhamadam" was recorded in May 1968, whilst In A Silent Way, and Bitches Brew didn't come along until 1969.
User avatar
J Ed
Supreme Lord!
Supreme Lord!
Posts: 5133
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 2:36 am
Location: in a midwestern-type autoplant town, waiting for the autopocalypse to come

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by J Ed »

Miles's music had been getting progressively more random sounding throughout the existence of the 2nd Great Quintet, and producer Teo Macero had been playing a more active role cutting and pasting chunks of recording sessions into audiocollages that made up the final release
so the prior album, Filles des Kilamanjaro, anticipates Silent Way as much as Silent Way anticipates Bitches Brew though its lesserknown
I dont recall it sounding anywhere near so random as Rhamadam however

I do for some reason keep assuming Syd listened to all that stuff, probably moreso than the other Floyds, but dont know where I got that fixed idea from
his sister when asked once said Syd listened to Charlie Parker and Thelonious Monk, but I think she meant in his latter years
I dont know if theres any evidence what Syd listened to while he was still actively making music
User avatar
nosaj
Supreme Lord!
Supreme Lord!
Posts: 8263
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:33 pm
Location: Vortex spiral...its cool!

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by nosaj »

I like it!! I bet I will listen to it more than Metallic Spheres in the years ahead.

But, 156 kbps mp3? Really? ](*,)

Personally, I don't know if there had to be an influence on this song, in the vein of, "I was listening to so-and-so, lets do a jam like..."
User avatar
danielcaux
Supreme Judge!
Supreme Judge!
Posts: 2546
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Abya Yala

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by danielcaux »

Perhaps it was just a case of the Jugband Blues aproach: get some competent musicians and tell them to do whatever they like!
User avatar
Idisaffect
Judge!
Judge!
Posts: 2039
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: here now

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by Idisaffect »

danielcaux wrote:. The page turning didn't bother me at all, .
The page turning is one of my favorite moments in the album. I love that song. The fact that it was so fresh that Barrett had to turn the page in the middle of it just really appeals to me. It's funny as hell, too. It's like parody. Maybe it is parody.

I'd imagine the influence for Rhamadam was your basic psychedelic jam band circa 1968.
I don't think Barrett brought in charts for the musicians. (As if!) Joe Zawinul and Wayne Shorter had written music for their compositions on Bitches Brew and earlier albums. Rhamadam probably "just happened".
User avatar
zag
Judge!
Judge!
Posts: 2330
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:50 pm
Location: in the woods

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by zag »

danielcaux wrote: I was thinking about that yesterday, and my hypothesis is that perhaps Gilmour is actually fond of the track, as it is, because it was one of the tracks he originally produced
but why bother to clean up Octobus and others and still leave that "bad start" in The Introduction, does that "error" really make it any better or more fragile than as it is.
As if Dave wants us to belive that Syd was just passé and impossible to work with. I have no doupt that both Waters and Gilmour felt that too. However Malcolm Jones (produced better sessions imo), Robert Wyatt, Hugh Hopper and others said Syd was an easy going type, even Jerry Shirley noticed that Syd was sometimes ha ha having a laugh. A madcap indeed. :roll:

I don´t know about you guys but I feel somewhat uncomfortable when I listen re-arranged Octobus, must be the age thing :lol:
tebrookes
Embryo
Embryo
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by tebrookes »

I agree, Zag, the 'fake' false start in Octopus re-mix is cheap. The track didn't need fiddling with. It's perfect as it is.
Wolfpack
Hammer
Hammer
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Rhamadam - How good is it ?

Post by Wolfpack »

This topic is about 'Rhamadan'. [-X :)

I've posted a reply (including a question) in another topic.