What exactly makes a debate a "Gilmour Vs Waters debate"? For example, if I were to point out the fact Gilmour once said "I played bass on over half the early records" when he actually did not play bass on over half the early records, exactly what am I doing besides pointing out the fact Gilmour spread incorrect information in the said interview? Someone needs to define precisely what is a Gilmour Vs. Waters debate.
What exactly is a "personal attack" on a discussion board?
What exactly is "aggressive language"? It seems to me there are many overly-sensitive blokes on the internet who find un-aggressive language aggressive...The line is drawn somewhere, of course. What's the line, chief?
Is criticism of the Almighty Divine Gods Celebrated As Pink Floyd now prohibited? Or will ANY criticism be labeled a "personal attack" on the supposed Holy Gods?
The way I see it, the more rules there are the more complicated and ultimately unfair things get. This applies to nations, organizations, and even message boards. As we all know, it's your board and you are making the rules. Hopefully these new rules (It seems to me there is really only ONE new rule) will be better for your message board.
Some Obvious Questions...
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:31 pm
- Location: The Dark Side of Neptune
Some Obvious Questions...
Last edited by Real Pink in the Inside on Sun Jan 12, 2003 3:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17163
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 9:18 pm
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7074
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:54 pm
- Location: Edinburgh or Aberdeen depending on the time of year
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17163
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: Dallas TX