The user Moom has had his account banned for 6 months due to non-conformance with the forum rules on a consistent basis despite a series of past consultations, previous shorter bans and an almost constant flow of PMs about his forum flooding, pointless replies to every topic on the forum and, more recently, his perverted over-taking of a RIP thread. His account shall be re-instated on 29th November 2012 when, I hope, he will return a reformed individual more adept at conducting himself in a proper manner.
Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.
Moom's Banning 2012
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17166
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
-
- Blade
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 1:06 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: In the shadow with a cold beer
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Hmmm...
"So don’t worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring its own worries. Today’s trouble is enough for today."?
Well, Moom was the first to bid me welcome to this forum.
I treasure that!
"So don’t worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring its own worries. Today’s trouble is enough for today."?
Well, Moom was the first to bid me welcome to this forum.
I treasure that!
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 9075
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:40 pm
- Location: Truly gone ddebilfishing
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Keith Jordan wrote: Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.
"Let he who wears socks with sandals be banished for an eternity - well, 6 months at least."
-
- Supreme Judge!
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:26 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: right here....
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
(much nicer than what i would have said)
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:45 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Gravity Eyelids
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Sad. Can't wait till November 29th.
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 9202
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 6:08 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Is he a member too ?Keith Jordan wrote:
Please consider what Jesus would say before posting any replies.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:57 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Argentina
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.Keith Jordan wrote:The user Moom has had his account banned for 6 months due to non-conformance with the forum rules on a consistent basis despite a series of past consultations, previous shorter bans and an almost constant flow of PMs about his forum flooding, pointless replies to every topic on the forum and, more recently, his perverted over-taking of a RIP thread.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17166
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
He had years of warnings but he decided to ignore them.thefinalcut wrote:Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:57 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Argentina
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Well, in that case I back you up on your resolution.
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 10918
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Edinburgh - Scotland
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
I don't think he ignored them though. I think he just couldn't realistically act on the advice and warning you were giving him. As I said before, I think his somewhat antisocial behaviour ran a little bit deeper than just 'another perv on the internet'. However given my squabbles with him I am probably sat a little too close to the pit face to offer any opinion without sounding like I'm trying to clear my own name or somesuch.Keith Jordan wrote:He had years of warnings but he decided to ignore them.thefinalcut wrote:Despite his bad behavior on this board, he will be missed.
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:45 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Gravity Eyelids
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
(Ignore this post if you want to, and ignore it again if you've not read my breakfast's post. If you've read it, ignore it still. )
-
- Supreme Judge!
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:26 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: right here....
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
i don't miss him, i'm not sorry he's gone. and although i think alan may be right about him not fully understanding his own antisocial behavior, i don't think that excuses it either. i don't know, or care, if he ever understood the disgusting remark he made to me, but he definitely never really apoligized for it. his self-serving little "oh woe is me" thread after his last ban proved that.
...and if he ever comes back, i hope he never addresses me again, even with a long-overdue apology. i certainly will not acknowledge him. stupid little (insert your own expletive).
(oh...did i say that out loud??)
...and if he ever comes back, i hope he never addresses me again, even with a long-overdue apology. i certainly will not acknowledge him. stupid little (insert your own expletive).
(oh...did i say that out loud??)
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 8370
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:55 pm
- Location: travelling by telephone
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
I have him on ignore for a very long time now...
Dont see a reason to trouble my grey cells with his posts.
Dont see a reason to trouble my grey cells with his posts.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:57 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Argentina
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
Damn!t wrote: Dont see a reason to trouble my grey cells with his posts.
LOL !
-
- Supreme Lord!
- Posts: 5133
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 2:36 am
- Location: in a midwestern-type autoplant town, waiting for the autopocalypse to come
Re: Moom's Banning 2012
how come the ontopic parts of NPF have been virtually silent these last two weeks but the one thread talking about moom keeps getting several additional comments every day?
surely somebody else has bought a new album they could be telling us about, instead of gossiping about moom yet again, just for example
and theres other non-moom-related threads all over the forum that could benefit from your contributions
surely somebody else has bought a new album they could be telling us about, instead of gossiping about moom yet again, just for example
and theres other non-moom-related threads all over the forum that could benefit from your contributions