kitkat wrote:1. Uh, the original point was that Roger had LESS integrity than Gilmour cause Waters played DSOTM even though he didnt have an album that he wife wrote for him to promote. I called bullshit. I still call bullshit.
2. I am not the one who said anybody's reputatation was damaged..that was somebody else. I was simply defending the creator of DSOTM against the stupid logic that you shouldnt play your album to a mass audience unless you have an album that your wife wrote for you to promote. Now THAT is a stupid ass view.
3. You keep trying to expand the argument but I am not falling into that silly trap. I will stay on point. I made my point and it is accurate.
4. You didnt even go it sounds like. Your loss...it ruled. I was leaning on the stage and it was awesome.
5. Nothing more comical than talking about Waters "integrity" about playing his own music to a happy audience. Unbelievably absurd. A cover bar band?? What a dumb comment dude.
6. I can tell you didnt go to college. <====JK that part Mr. sensititivity.
7. Oh yeah, I forgot......pwned.
1. Yeah...isn't that what I said? My point was that Gilmour's integrity (at least inasmuch as "proper" usage of DSOTM,) is in better shape than Waters' is.
You should try actually reading my posts instead of just skimming over them and then gleaning whatever you wish out of them.
2. Yes, actually; you were. You've repeatedly attacked Gilmour's credibility by upholding that of Waters as though it were without tarnish.
Life lesson, here:
No one's integrity is untarnished, fanboy.
Do I really need to go through the trouble of tracking down and posting all of the songwriting credits for DSOTM to illustrate that Waters did NOT create DSOTM single-handly?
Do I REALLY need to do that?
Or should I point out to you that in the nearly forty years since DSOTM has been released, the closest that Waters has ever gotten to anything comparable has been Amused To Death?
Gilmour is ALL OVER DSOTM...and so is Wright.
Waters has even repeatedly stated that DSOTM was the last album where it felt like they were an actual, functioning band.
Which, by implication, means that at least two of the Ringos were actively contributing.
Again...DSOTM did not spring whole-cloth from Roger's bosom.
3. Just because YOU say that your point is accurate does NOT make it so.
You can insist and insist and insist upon it all you want to (and I'm sure you will,) but your continued insistence does not make your point anything more than your opinion.
Which you're welcome to, as inaccurate as it is.
4. Neither Roger Waters solo, nor Pink Floyd without him, nor Pink Floyd with him could live up to my expectations. Hence, I've never seen any reason to trek a minimum of two hours just to hear a bunch of stuff that I'm so intimately familiar with that I've played it note-for-note in bands and had people telling me they thought it was a cd when they walked in.
The only reason for me to go would be "bragging rights."
Bragging rights are not terribly important to me. They seem kind of petty, actually.
5. Actually, hearing someone defend Waters' rights to perform music he wrote while simultaneously deriding Gilmour for the same thing has proven VERY entertaining.
6. Of course you can. I write better than you.
7. Let's make it official this time...
YOU'VE BEEN MOSSIFIED, SUCKAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111oneoneone
![[-D-]](./images/smilies/eusa_clap.gif "Applause"){kind=small}
