I found this on a spanish-language Pink Floyd board.
Even I could understand it.
"Waters contra Gilmour
waters es un genio
gilmour un virtuso"
I guess their board hasn't instituted a policy on this particular topic yet!
Somethings are universal
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:01 pm
- Location: lost anglos
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 11:44 pm
- Location: over the rainbow
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 4:52 pm
-
- Knife
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 3:11 pm
- Location: Eureka CA USA
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:01 pm
- Location: lost anglos
-
- Axe
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 7:37 pm
"Waters contra Gilmour
waters es un genio
gilmour un virtuso"
Translation:
"Waters vs. Gilmour
Waters is a genius
Gilmour is a virtuoso"
In my opinion, the one who wrote it is in the right. Waters is a genius as a composer, and Gilmour is a virtuoso playing guitar, but it doesn't mean that Waters isn't a virtuoso and Gilmour isn't a genius . (Anyone understands what I wrote?)
Which Spanish forum is that? I want to see it!
Cheers!
waters es un genio
gilmour un virtuso"
Translation:
"Waters vs. Gilmour
Waters is a genius
Gilmour is a virtuoso"
In my opinion, the one who wrote it is in the right. Waters is a genius as a composer, and Gilmour is a virtuoso playing guitar, but it doesn't mean that Waters isn't a virtuoso and Gilmour isn't a genius . (Anyone understands what I wrote?)
Which Spanish forum is that? I want to see it!
Cheers!
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:01 pm
- Location: lost anglos
It's from here:Fireland wrote:"Waters contra Gilmour
waters es un genio
gilmour un virtuso"
Translation:
"Waters vs. Gilmour
Waters is a genius
Gilmour is a virtuoso"
In my opinion, the one who wrote it is in the right. Waters is a genius as a composer, and Gilmour is a virtuoso playing guitar, but it doesn't mean that Waters isn't a virtuoso and Gilmour isn't a genius . (Anyone understands what I wrote?)
Which Spanish forum is that? I want to see it!
Cheers!
http://pf.at4.net/
make sure you don't ask to have the site translated to English, otherwise you can't get the message board.
-
- Axe
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 7:37 pm
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 11:17 pm
- Location: Croatia
If only they had different charachters... Waters was a crap as a bass player (just listen to any PF live thing with Waters on bass), but he was indeed a lyrical genious. THE GREAT ONE! Because of his lyrics, the albums such as DSOTM, WYWH, The Wall and Animals became classics. Opposed to Waters, Gilmour was better as a guitar player, he was a multi instrumentalist (guitar, keyboards, drums, bass, slide, harmonica...), but his lyrics were idealess - he didn't know how to tell a story (both Childhood's End and Time ended with a weary words ''so this is how the song will end (CE) / the song is over (Time)''. But, one thing I would like to point out, the genious and virtuoso is Syd Barrett.
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 9:01 pm
- Location: lost anglos
"How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?"crofloyd wrote:... Waters was a crap as a bass player (just listen to any PF live thing with Waters on bass), but he was indeed a lyrical genious ... Gilmour was better as a guitar player, he was a multi instrumentalist (guitar, keyboards, drums, bass, slide, harmonica...), but his lyrics were idealess - he didn't know how to tell a story (both Childhood's End and Time ended with a weary words ''so this is how the song will end (CE) / the song is over (Time)''. But, one thing I would like to point out, the genious and virtuoso is Syd Barrett.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 7:05 pm
- Location: Somewhere, but not here
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 4:52 pm