I find it fascinating to see how songs develop from when they are written, performed for the first time, performed for the 50th time, recorded and played for the 100th time!
Released on 23rd January 1977 in the UK, the album "Animals" is one of my favourites. I think it is based on Orwell's classic, "Animal Farm". One of the songs "Dogs" started out it's life a few years earlier and, below, is a live recording from 1974 from the RoIO "British Winter Tour, 1974". It shows a different feel and lyrics and let's us see how the song developed!
Do you like the original "Gotta Be Crazy" version? What do you think of it's development?
Right-click and "save target as..." to save to your computer before playing.
<848kb> http://www.neptunepinkfloyd.co.uk/audio ... s_clip.mp3
Oh how songs change!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17166
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:24 pm
- Location: London
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17166
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 6:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Cheshire, England
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Goi?nia - Brazil
It's very interisting when we listen to a new version of the music... I like one version of breath... I don't know in what ROIO I listened it, but the song is slower than the original one... it's very good!!! (And i prefer to make cover of this version - everybody like the song when I play lake that)
Bazil Shining diamond!!!
Bazil Shining diamond!!!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7074
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:54 pm
- Location: Edinburgh or Aberdeen depending on the time of year
I prefer You Gotta Be Crazy from the tour to Dogs. Dogs seems to go to long while YGBC has all the best bits in it and IMO more intresting lyrics. I know this may get some stick, but the lyrics originally were just odd and harsh, and as the song developed and they gained confidence in playing it it just got better and better. And Roger's voice definitly benefits from the live experience for his section of the song.
Last edited by David Smith on Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 6:30 am
- Location: Cuckooland
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
To me...they're almost two different songs. Certainly the lyrics are largely different, but if I have to pick one, I gotta pick Dogs over YGBC, just for the triple tracked guitar solo in the slow sections.
Just as a public service, Roger Waters has denied on more than one occasion that Animals is based on Animal Farm...or anything Orwellian.
Just thought I'd pass that on.
Just as a public service, Roger Waters has denied on more than one occasion that Animals is based on Animal Farm...or anything Orwellian.
Just thought I'd pass that on.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 10:28 pm
- Location: Toronto
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1661
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 11:00 pm
- Location: Fearless, LY
I think Live before a studio release and Live after are two different things. Live before is new, fresh, expiremental. After the studio version you don't have a wide as path to go down. Its pretty set. Even though some songs can kick some major you know what live. But I think in the end studio is the way to go. Even with the best live audio recordings you can't beat the studio sounds. Now if its before a studio, then its even better because you get to see trasformation, something new, sometimes completely different. Any way. Thats my two shillings.
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2003 5:44 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
-
- Embryo
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Mmm. Tough call.
Sonically I do like the live clip - what I can hear of it - but it really seems to have a completely different character than the recorded version.
It's much more "thick", an unchanging flow, whereas Dogs surges and ebbs orchestrally. I don't think the vocal melody of the live version is very interesting... it's pretty much one note in one unchanging rhythm, without any prosody. I also am not entirely sure what I think of the almost Steely Dan-ish, fusiony feel. I love Steely dan, but I love Floyd for very different reasons, and generally the twain don't meet.
That said, overall, I like the live version a lot, and could see listening to as much as I listen to any other Floyd if I had it in decent quality. I see the comparison very much the same as comparing Obscured By Clouds to Dark Side Of The Moon... similar territory is explored, one is just clearly much more glossy, polished, and painstakingly done... but that doesn't mean it's necessarily better. They're both great and have their individual, differing charms.
That'll be $.02, please.
It's much more "thick", an unchanging flow, whereas Dogs surges and ebbs orchestrally. I don't think the vocal melody of the live version is very interesting... it's pretty much one note in one unchanging rhythm, without any prosody. I also am not entirely sure what I think of the almost Steely Dan-ish, fusiony feel. I love Steely dan, but I love Floyd for very different reasons, and generally the twain don't meet.
That said, overall, I like the live version a lot, and could see listening to as much as I listen to any other Floyd if I had it in decent quality. I see the comparison very much the same as comparing Obscured By Clouds to Dark Side Of The Moon... similar territory is explored, one is just clearly much more glossy, polished, and painstakingly done... but that doesn't mean it's necessarily better. They're both great and have their individual, differing charms.
That'll be $.02, please.
Last edited by kupietz on Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 6:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: manchester.england
animals
even though ive voted for the album version. i quite like the live one becuase its interesting to hear how ideas develope into structures that one day the writer will turn round and say thats the one. because at the end of the day its like when an artist paints. if he keeps adding paint and more ideas it will end up a brown mess. all over the show.
sorry i thought i was cantona for a minute.
sorry i thought i was cantona for a minute.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 7:53 am
- Location: Krud City
I love both tracks. YGTBC was the second song I ever heard them play live (Raving and drooling was the first) so I have been totally biased since then. The album version is brill but so is the live version. What the 74 and 77 versions show is progression that if you work on it, cut out the bits that dont work and add in bits that do you can create a master piece. its very much in the same vain as The Wall, listen to the demo's and listen to the released version, the later version is alot easier to listen to. Its also the same for any of their tracks that were toured prior to release. Listen to the first live version of Dark side and compair it to the released version, it progressed leaps and bounds. So it would be fair to say that YGTBC is a demo of Dogs