While watching this I noticed there was footage of floyd live from the wall tour, They said they were even gonna put it in the film at one stage.
Does this mean there is a whole live show of the wall in a vault somewhere waiting to be put on dvd?
Watching the making of the wall
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: New Zealand
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1661
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 11:00 pm
- Location: Fearless, LY
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 5:54 pm
- Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 11:11 pm
- Location: Dalton, Georgia.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: New Zealand
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 7:50 pm
- Location: Wisconsin USA
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 8:40 am
- Location: Holland
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 10:28 pm
- Location: Toronto
I think Roger should just say, "to hell with it!" and release the wall live on dvd, I dont know why hes worried about quality after all the horrible quality shows ive seen even a half decent show would be a welcome surprise! And money is no issue, im sure every single pink floyd fan would buy a copy if it came out. So whats stopping him?
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 11:44 pm
- Location: over the rainbow
I don't know, but I can take a stab at it...MikeWaters wrote:So whats stopping him?
Because The Wall is such an epic, and probably the most famous piece of work he has put his name to (other than DSOTM), he probably doesn't want to be known as putting out an inferior example of filming. There's a part in the Earl's Court video that I have (toward the end during "Stop") where it's rather awful...you can't see anything on stage...it's so far away, and you can't see anything projected on the wall either. He is probably disturbed by the quality, and there probably wasn't enough footage shot where they could piece together something.
He's probably thinking past the current fans who would snatch it up, past his own lifetime, maybe? Maybe he doesn't want to be thought of as putting out an inferiorly-shot piece of work just to satisfy the fans at the time.
After all, it isn't about the money...if it were just that, he'd probably have released it already.
I don't know...just a thought.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 10:28 pm
- Location: Toronto
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 7:50 pm
- Location: Wisconsin USA
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 10:28 pm
- Location: Toronto
ROIOS are just low generation copys of the original copy, so once its copied too many times the quality starts to go. so someboady out there has a 2nd generation copy that is as good as the master.
Thats what im thinking, but who knows what problems there might be.Plus, with all of the technology available today you'd think that someone could clean it up if need be.
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:31 pm
- Location: The Dark Side of Neptune
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 11:17 pm
- Location: Croatia
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: New Zealand