mosespa wrote:
I think all four of them should write their own books...each of them. That would really be the only way to get a "complete" history, really.
Five.
Least likely to occur, But I think Syd's "memeories" of the times would be a might valuable as well.
Location: In the editing bay...working on the final cut...
Postby mosespa »
Not to beat a dead horse, but I just took it as a given that everyone else would figure that Syd probably wouldn't be able to write a book about the band and thus, discount him from the notion as a publishing member of the group.
princessDungan74D wrote:hes mainly hurting himself really...........hes making himself look bad and losing respect from his fans......it breaks my heart say this but hes needs to stop acting like a jackass.
Libby you should be proud of your self, I know I just gained a tremendous amount of respect for you and what you say.
If Roger Waters heard you (his biggest fan) say that he would rejoin pink floyd in an instant.
mosespa wrote:
Let's not forget, folks...Mason's book was supposed to have been out over a year ago; but Gilmour apparently took issue with Mason writing the "official" history of Pink Floyd (as the book was originally called.)
LOL! ....OWned!....GILMOUR IS A WANKER OMG!!!111... wtf?....
seriously though, releasing little bit of 'revealing' book in that time would have hurted Gilmours Pink Floyd business merchandise selling.
Roger gives 25% of his income to charity and in his interview about war in his website he even blames himself about iraq war (apperantly, he has a car!).
and doesnt he always talk how he wasted his life untill he was 28 years old? (when he started to write DSOTM)
mosespa wrote:
I think all four of them should write their own books...each of them. That would really be the only way to get a "complete" history, really.
Five.
Least likely to occur, But I think Syd's "memeories" of the times would be a might valuable as well.
Syd can write?
I always figured Syd would be much better able to express his 'autobiography' through some form of fine art (drawing, painting etc)
crofloyd wrote:I have read about Roger's reactions on Nick's book in Word magazine and I see Roger as a grumpy old wanker with non stop critics on Nick's book.
Have you actually read the article yet? Well before you start making judgements on an interview you haven't read allow me to provide a bit more of the quotation
Q Is Nick Mason's book good?
Yes it's very nice, light hearted. And it's got a lot of facts un it. I would recommend it to anybody- but you know, don't take it to seriously
He then continues to state it does not always tell what he would call 'the truth' and that when Nick asked him for some input he write "utter bollocks" across the page, which i think in this context of events is far more lighthearted than anything else
Location: Darkside of The Moon, The Otherside (Birmingham, UK)
Postby Hawkeye the floyder »
What i read in the pink floyd mag the was out in sept. is that rog DID like nicks book and was just a bit disapointed that there wernt much stuff about sex in it.... I'm sorry but its going a bit far with the wanker stuff....all rock stars r wankers including david g.
Last edited by Hawkeye the floyder on Tue Nov 09, 2004 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Location: Darkside of The Moon, The Otherside (Birmingham, UK)
Postby Hawkeye the floyder »
pinknewbie wrote:
princessDungan74D wrote:hes mainly hurting himself really...........hes making himself look bad and losing respect from his fans......it breaks my heart say this but hes needs to stop acting like a jackass.
Libby you should be proud of your self, I know I just gained a tremendous amount of respect for you and what you say.
If Roger Waters heard you (his biggest fan) say that he would rejoin pink floyd in an instant.
Wow that took guts...but i must say she is right...
I'm sorry but its going a bit far with the wanker stuff....all rock stars r wankers including david g.](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
