This poll does NOT violate any of NPF's rules.
I am simply interested in which DVD is more popular.
Which Do You Prefer? (DVD Question)
-
- Judge!
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:31 pm
- Location: The Dark Side of Neptune
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7074
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:54 pm
- Location: Edinburgh or Aberdeen depending on the time of year
Long as it stays on preference and not aimless slagging then fine (e.g Dave ruined a song he didn't even write.)
I haven't seen either, although i've seen part of Dave's dvd and heard the cd of Rogers. I would normally vote Rogers 'cause it had more variation, but i'm going with Dave's 'cause his version of shine on was something truely special.
I haven't seen either, although i've seen part of Dave's dvd and heard the cd of Rogers. I would normally vote Rogers 'cause it had more variation, but i'm going with Dave's 'cause his version of shine on was something truely special.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 11:14 pm
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 7:05 pm
- Location: Somewhere, but not here
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Southampton,England
They are hard to compare from the point of view that,David's is a stripped down accoustic show,and Roger's was a proper tour concert,so is full blown.But just for Shine On alone David gets my vote!!!!!!
Yeah,i forgot,you get smile,which i think is wonderful,plus i went to David's show,so,it means a bit more
Yeah,i forgot,you get smile,which i think is wonderful,plus i went to David's show,so,it means a bit more
Last edited by qjamesfloyd on Mon Apr 14, 2003 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Axe
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:15 pm
- Location: Iowa
Yea that version of Shine On from Dave's DVD is amazing. I was'nt expecting that when I pushed play but none the less, its an awesome rendition. I have Rogers also, it's good because it gives you the concert feel as opposed to Dave's beeing a little more intimate. Plus we get a new song Smile on Daves DVD. So I voted for dave.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 1:53 am
- Location: Stalham, Nr Norwich UK
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 7:50 pm
- Location: Wisconsin USA
-
- Blade
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 1:26 am
- Location: Northampton England
I think Dave's just pips it for me!
I like the mellowness of the whole affair, nice atmosphere.
In Rog's favour though, he's got a damn good guitarist with him. I'd never heard of Doyle Bramhall II until ITF. I'm beginning to find his (and Snowy White's) variations on the Floyd solo's...great. I love comfy numb on ITF but then I hear Dave doing it on DGIC....aaahhh....perfect.
Yep, Dave gets my vote!
I like the mellowness of the whole affair, nice atmosphere.
In Rog's favour though, he's got a damn good guitarist with him. I'd never heard of Doyle Bramhall II until ITF. I'm beginning to find his (and Snowy White's) variations on the Floyd solo's...great. I love comfy numb on ITF but then I hear Dave doing it on DGIC....aaahhh....perfect.
Yep, Dave gets my vote!
-
- Blade
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
which one's pink?
I didn't vote because it was too hard a question....David's Shine on was simply wonderful, along with WYWH and a very nice comfortably numb.
Roger has got some wonderful life performances on his dvd as well.... Dogs is brilliant, In the Flesh is fantastic, and he even has some really good solo performances in there including It's a miracle, perfect sense parts 1 & 2, Bravery of being out of range and Amused to Death.
Roger's DVD is sentimental to me as i went to Glastonbury 02 just for him...and it was wonderful to see the "In the Flesh" tour live.
How can i choose...both of them great musicians, still able to perform great....just a shame that we can't get the two of them in a room together and tell them to kiss and make up.
Roger has got some wonderful life performances on his dvd as well.... Dogs is brilliant, In the Flesh is fantastic, and he even has some really good solo performances in there including It's a miracle, perfect sense parts 1 & 2, Bravery of being out of range and Amused to Death.
Roger's DVD is sentimental to me as i went to Glastonbury 02 just for him...and it was wonderful to see the "In the Flesh" tour live.
How can i choose...both of them great musicians, still able to perform great....just a shame that we can't get the two of them in a room together and tell them to kiss and make up.
-
- Hammer
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
Re: which one's pink?
Right on, ditto.Comfortably_Floyd wrote:I didn't vote because it was too hard a question....
-
- Axe
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 1:52 pm
I voted ITF, but I would have preferred another setlist. I don't have to hear dsotm every time.
It is now almost like 'Pink Floyd'; a band trying to sound like they're Pink Floyd. I like the live versions of Waters' previous tours better, most of the time; the guitarists were too restricted this tour. And why not a sax solo on breath, no sax on welcome to the machine, why no guitarsolo on eclipse? I thought this was great on his previous tours. Not just playing the studioversions live, but just playing the music.
I think Gilmour kills comfortably numb live, on dsot, on pulse and now again. But having said that, I like the Berlin 90 version best, so why take my opion serious, right?
And the second part of shine on is just horrible. Guess I am not a Pink Floyd fan after all
It is now almost like 'Pink Floyd'; a band trying to sound like they're Pink Floyd. I like the live versions of Waters' previous tours better, most of the time; the guitarists were too restricted this tour. And why not a sax solo on breath, no sax on welcome to the machine, why no guitarsolo on eclipse? I thought this was great on his previous tours. Not just playing the studioversions live, but just playing the music.
I think Gilmour kills comfortably numb live, on dsot, on pulse and now again. But having said that, I like the Berlin 90 version best, so why take my opion serious, right?
And the second part of shine on is just horrible. Guess I am not a Pink Floyd fan after all